In an exclusive interview with Hindustan Times, Allen Koh, the founder of the renowned US-based educational consulting company Cardinal Education, shed light on the hidden complexities of university admissions in the United States, particularly for Asian students. Koh’s insights come at a time when the Supreme Court’s June 2023 ruling on affirmative action has stirred a heated debate across the nation, following the end of race-conscious considerations in university admissions.
The Supreme Court decision, which came after a landmark case brought by the non-profit organization Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) against Harvard University, has challenged long-standing diversity programs aimed at ensuring a representative mix of students in US classrooms. The case claimed that such policies have led to an “anti-Asian bias,” placing Asian American applicants under disproportionately higher scrutiny in the admissions process.
Asian Domination in Computer Science: ‘Undesirable’?
Koh shared a startling revelation during the interview: despite the US touting its commitment to diversity, some American universities view the high representation of Asian students in fields like Computer Science as “undesirable.” While diversity of ideas and perspectives has been a long-standing selling point for American higher education, Koh explained that universities are increasingly wary of the overwhelming dominance of Asian students in certain STEM fields. “This has led to quieter but concerted efforts to balance out the numbers,” Koh noted.
Asians, particularly from countries like China and India, have long been attracted to Computer Science and Engineering programs due to the job prospects they offer in the tech-driven US economy. However, this influx of Asian students into STEM disciplines has created unintended consequences. Some institutions, Koh explained, feel that the overrepresentation of one ethnic group in these areas may dilute the diverse learning environment they seek to promote.
The Changing Cultural Landscape and Affirmative Action
Koh’s remarks come in the context of a broader cultural and political shift in the US. The recent Supreme Court decision has polarized opinions, with some celebrating the end of race-based admissions policies as a step toward meritocracy, while others argue it undermines the progress made toward inclusivity. The SFFA case accused universities of implementing admissions policies that discriminated against Asian Americans by setting higher bars for them compared to applicants from other ethnic backgrounds.
According to Koh, while race-conscious admissions programs had noble intentions to foster diversity, they inadvertently fueled stereotypes. “Asians are often stereotyped as ‘high achievers’ or ‘model minorities,’ which in some cases works against them during the admissions process,” Koh explained. These stereotypes not only affect the students’ admission chances but also influence classroom dynamics and the general perception of Asian students on campus.
More Read
Community College Stigma and Misconceptions
Koh also touched upon another critical issue: the stigma surrounding community colleges in the US. Despite being a viable pathway for many students, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds, community colleges are often dismissed by international and domestic students alike as lesser options. Koh debunked this myth, highlighting the fact that many community college graduates successfully transfer to prestigious four-year institutions, including Ivy League schools. “There’s a significant misconception that community colleges are for ‘weaker’ students, but the truth is, they offer a cost-effective and flexible route to top-tier universities,” he said.
Paths to Ivy League and Beyond
Koh’s interview also delved into lesser-known pathways to securing spots at prestigious institutions like Harvard, Stanford, and MIT. He emphasized that while academic excellence remains crucial, universities are increasingly looking for well-rounded students who can contribute to the campus community in unique ways. “Ivy League admissions are about more than just grades and test scores. Universities want leaders, innovators, and those who bring fresh perspectives.”
The US college admissions landscape is evolving, influenced by shifting legal frameworks, cultural dynamics, and the changing political climate. For Asian students, particularly those aiming for competitive fields like Computer Science, these changes bring both challenges and opportunities. Koh’s insights offer a sobering view of how these students navigate a system that is, in some cases, stacked against them, but also provide hope by dispelling myths about pathways to success, including community colleges and lesser-trodden routes to Ivy League institutions.
As the world watches these changes unfold, one thing remains clear: the debate over diversity and representation in American higher education is far from settled.
