The case of “Tiger King 2” is reflective of a new phenomenon in the world of documentaries: sequelize works that are non-fiction in nature. It speaks to a shift in audience expectation and a changing documentary filmmaking nature—quite literally, stories once thought concluded are revisited further for exploration or follow-up. “Tiger King,” the Netflix original series launched in 2020, is a weird tale involving a merry zookeeper by the name of Joe Exotic and his stumbling block—the animal rights activist Carole Baskin. It is a critical look at the world of trade in exotic animals, with ethical dilemmas and legal cases of gigantic proportions between the characters—bigger than life—involved in a plot of intrigue and controversy. Probably most prominent of all, though, was that it helped Joe Exotic gain widespread recognition—a sea of endless memes and cultural debates over animal welfare and exploitation. The success of “Tiger King” set up the sequel, “Tiger King 2,” which looks into the aftermath of Joe Exotic being sent to prison and what happened to some of the characters in this ongoing saga. Documentaries like these live on real-life drama and unpredictability; they will set up a lot for audiences ‘looking in’ on worlds presumably beyond their familiarity.
The fact that there’s a call to do the sequel to “Tiger King” just goes to show one thing: the documentary series continues, and the audiences are going after it. Unlike fictional sequels, most of which continue established narratives merely for entertainment purposes, documentary sequels get deeper into real events and personalities, providing new insights and updates on how situations evolve. The rise of documentary sequels can be explained by the wider changes taking place in the landscape of media consumption and storytelling formats. Streaming services like Netflix have irrevocably changed how documentaries are produced, distributed, and consumed; with them, filmmakers are able to return time and again to subjects that interest them and film developments as they happen.
It is dissimilar to conventional documentary filmmaking, which usually tries to capture a moment in time or explore one issue in isolation. Audiences, too, have a role in creating demand for documentary sequels. The case of “Tiger King” was a very strong proof of how much the public had hungered for engrossing real-life stories and characters that defied convention. Viewers respond to documentaries that overturn perceptions, stimulate them, or give insight into some intricate social issue or personal story.
More Read
A proliferation of documentary sequels does raise questions about the exploitation of real-life documentary subjects and entertainment value versus journalistic integrity. Filmmakers should be very careful in balancing these concerns, ensuring their work is, in one place, sensitive to the respect and privacy of the persons involved and truthful to facts and events. In the case of “Tiger King 2,” more of the legal and personal battles of Joe Exotic and his associates are captured on film by the movie team, pointing out many new developments and considerably throwing more light on continuing controversies. The series acts as a sequel to the original story, updating the central characters’ lives while still reverting thematically to animal welfare, justice, and stardom’s price. Documentary sequels also allow for follow-ups on unfinished questions or delving deeper into issues the original film has raised but has not had the time to fully explore. They provide the filmmakers with the opportunity to contradict first impressions, introduce new evidence, or allow alternative insights that would give the audience a better understanding of the subject matter. Some critics believe that documentary sequels can either dilute the effect of a ground-breaking first film or go too much into the personal lives of the subjects with whom it is dealing for continued entertainment value. Maintaining journalistic integrity and ethical standards is always a high-balancing act amid desires to deliver audiences what they expect in film: compelling storytelling and new revelations. Even in light of these concerns, the overwhelming popularity of “Tiger King 2” resonated because documentary storytelling has continuously pleased audiences with its powerful portrayal of the human experience in all its complexity. Viewers are always looking out for stories to think about, discuss, and discover. In other words, the very fact of “Tiger King 2” underlines a growing trend: how sequel documentaries can be life extenders for ongoing stories in a nonfiction territory.
The series builds on the success of the eponymous predecessor, following new developments and checking in with many of its eccentric characters. While documentary sequels pose problems of both ethics and narrative, they do open up possibilities for insight into the inner complexity of certain issues as well as capturing shifting dynamics within real-life stories. These are challenges filmmakers within the documentary genre will increasingly grapple with to engage and enlighten audiences through compelling and thought-provoking narratives.
