Proposed changes to UK copyright law designed to support the AI sector have sparked a wave of concern among creative professionals, with a Labour MP warning that the new rules “threaten to rip the rug from under” artists. James Frith, a former member of the band Finka, voiced his alarm over plans that would allow AI models to mine text and data freely. This, he argues, risks undermining the very rights that creators depend on to earn a living.
The UK Government is currently consulting on a proposal to introduce an exception to copyright law for “text data and mining,” which would enable AI developers to access and use large amounts of text-based content. While the initiative is aimed at improving AI’s access to data and fostering innovation, it has raised concerns that it may leave creators with little protection for their intellectual property.
In a recent statement, Frith, the MP for Bury North, expressed his deep concerns over the potential ramifications for the creative industries. He warned that the move could lead to an upheaval of copyright protections, leaving artists vulnerable and potentially damaging the sector for years to come.
“The proposals threaten to rip the rug from under our prized sector with sweeping changes to copyright law,” Frith explained. “Creators see it for what it is – an attempt to erode the protections they depend on. Copyright may not directly inspire hit songs or blockbuster movies, but it is the lifeblood of our creative industries. It feeds investment, supports income for musicians, writers, actors, and small businesses, and ensures that creators can thrive.”
Frith’s warning was echoed by Pete Wishart, the SNP MP for Perth and Kinross-shire, who suggested that no one believes the Government’s proposal will benefit both the AI sector and the creative industries. “Nobody believes that this proposal will support both AI and the creative sectors,” Wishart said, apologising to Culture Minister Sir Chris Bryant for what he described as a “misguided” policy.
Conservative former culture secretary Sir John Whittingdale also weighed in on the debate, highlighting concerns that the proposal would reverse long-standing copyright practices. Whittingdale criticised the idea of an opting-out system, which would require creators to actively choose to protect their rights, warning that it would place a “huge burden” on small rights holders, such as individual photographers.
The Government’s consultation on the matter has sparked widespread debate, with many MPs expressing frustration that the creative industries have not been adequately consulted. Sir Chris Bryant, however, sought to reassure Parliament, stating that the Government had not yet made a final decision. “We are consulting. This is not the second reading of a Bill, it is a consultation,” Bryant said.
Allison Gardner, Labour MP for Stoke-on-Trent South, also voiced her concerns, warning that the proposed changes risked turning the UK’s creative industry into a “future of fool’s gold data.” She urged MPs to imagine the UK had vast reserves of gold and asked whether it would be wise to give it away for free in the hope that outside organisations would invest in the UK.
For Wishart, the issue is not just about protecting the rights of creators, but about ensuring that AI development serves the broader public interest. “AI holds exciting potential to help consumers discover and engage with creative works,” he noted, “but forfeiting the humanity of creativity and suggesting that AI can replace the emotional and personal investment of artists is misguided.”
More Read
The consultation has prompted both sides of the debate to call for a clearer understanding of the implications of AI on the creative economy. Sir Chris Bryant responded by emphasising that intellectual property is crucial to the viability of the creative industries and expressed the Government’s commitment to improving licensing processes for AI developers while ensuring that creators are fairly compensated.
“We seek more licensing, greater control of rights, and legal clarity for all,” he explained. “We recognise the challenges, and we’re working to come to a technical solution that works for everyone.”
The Government’s proposals highlight the increasing tension between fostering innovation in AI and protecting the rights of creators who have long relied on copyright law to safeguard their work. As the consultation continues, it remains to be seen whether a compromise can be reached that satisfies both the AI sector and the creative industries.
With concerns over the potential impact of the proposed changes mounting, many are hoping for a solution that balances technological progress with the protection of the rights of those who shape the cultural landscape.
