WASHINGTON, D.C. – Anthony Brindisi, a former Democratic congressman from New York, has become the first ex-member of Congress in over two decades to be appointed to the federal judiciary. His confirmation, secured through a narrow 50-49 vote in the Democratic-led U.S. Senate on Wednesday, underscores the growing politicisation of judicial appointments in the United States.
Brindisi, 46, will serve as a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, taking over from David Hurd, the nation’s oldest active district court judge, who is retiring at the age of 87.
A historic appointment
Brindisi’s confirmation marks a significant departure from recent trends in judicial nominations, which have largely favoured candidates with no prior political experience. The last former member of Congress to join the bench was Bill Martini, a Republican, who was confirmed to the U.S. District Court in New Jersey in 2002.
Brindisi’s appointment reflects President Joe Biden’s broader approach to diversifying the federal judiciary by nominating individuals from varied professional backgrounds. His unique trajectory—from congressman to state court judge and now federal judge—has reignited discussions about the merits of political experience in judicial roles.
Brindisi’s career path
Elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2018, Brindisi served a single term before losing his seat to Republican Claudia Tenney in the 2020 election. He then returned to private practice at his family’s law firm, Brindisi, Murad & Brindisi Pearlman, before assuming a position as a state court judge in 2022.
His nomination for the federal judiciary initially faced hurdles. President Biden had originally nominated Jorge Rodriguez, a lawyer from the New York Attorney General’s Office, for the vacancy. However, Judge Hurd, based in the district’s smaller Utica courthouse, revoked his decision to take senior status—essentially postponing retirement—when Rodriguez was announced as his successor. Hurd argued that Rodriguez’s residency near Albany, the state capital, would leave Utica underserved.
In April, Hurd reaffirmed his decision to retire on the condition that his successor would be based in Utica. Following this, the Biden administration nominated Brindisi in July, a move that aligned with Hurd’s stipulations and addressed concerns raised by the local bar association.
Contentious senate debate
Brindisi’s confirmation process was contentious, with Senate Republicans scrutinising his legislative record during his September Judiciary Committee hearing. Critics raised concerns about his past support for bills favouring immigrants and LGBTQ rights, accusing him of being overly partisan.
Brindisi, however, emphasised the distinction between his former role as a lawmaker and his new responsibilities as a judge. “The role of a judge is fundamentally different from that of a legislator. My goal is to ensure all parties feel they have a fair and impartial hearing,” he stated.
The razor-thin vote reflects the deepening partisan divide over judicial appointments. With the Senate split almost evenly, Vice President Kamala Harris’s potential tiebreaking vote was not needed, as Brindisi narrowly secured majority support.
Implications for utica and the judiciary
Brindisi’s appointment has been welcomed in Utica, where concerns about the future of the local courthouse had intensified in recent years. The judiciary recently confirmed that there were no plans to close the courthouse, alleviating fears from legal professionals and local politicians.
More Read
Brindisi’s background as a local resident and experienced attorney has bolstered confidence that he will effectively serve the district. His appointment also underscores the importance of addressing regional needs in judicial appointments, a factor that played a decisive role in his nomination.
A broader judicial strategy
President Biden’s decision to nominate Brindisi fits within his broader strategy of diversifying the federal bench. Biden has prioritised candidates with varied professional experiences, including public defenders and civil rights lawyers, breaking away from the longstanding trend of predominantly appointing former prosecutors and corporate attorneys.
Brindisi’s confirmation is seen as a symbolic victory for Democrats amid a highly polarised political climate. However, it also highlights the challenges faced by judicial nominees with political backgrounds, as partisan scrutiny intensifies.
Looking ahead
As Brindisi takes up his role in the Northern District of New York, he is expected to bring his extensive legal and legislative experience to the bench. His confirmation, though contentious, reflects the evolving nature of judicial nominations and the enduring debates over the qualifications and experiences that best suit the federal judiciary.
Brindisi’s ability to balance impartiality with his unique background will be closely watched as he begins this new chapter in his career.
