A growing chorus of celebrities has called on the Government to reverse its controversial welfare cuts, describing the measures as “shameful” and a betrayal of the nation’s most vulnerable citizens. The proposed reforms, which include tightening eligibility for the Personal Independence Payment (PIP), are estimated to leave around a million people in England and Wales without crucial disability benefits, sparking widespread concern across the country.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has defended the Government’s plans, insisting that the current system is “morally and economically indefensible”. Officials claim the measures will deliver annual savings of over £5 billion by the end of the decade, with reforms to PIP – the main disability benefit – projected to account for the largest proportion of these savings. Research by the Resolution Foundation suggests that the stricter criteria could see between 800,000 and 1.2 million claimants losing between £4,200 and £6,300 a year, potentially leaving many disabled people facing unprecedented hardship.
Among those criticising the cuts is veteran actor and presenter Sir Stephen Fry, who has condemned the proposal as an attack on “the most vulnerable and overlooked of all our population”. In a public statement, he urged ministers to reconsider their approach, adding: “It’s not too late to rethink this.” Fry’s comments echo the views of many in the entertainment industry who believe that, in a society built on fairness and compassion, such drastic measures are both unprincipled and counterproductive.
Succession star Brian Cox also weighed in on the debate. Drawing on his own experiences of childhood poverty, Cox described the Government’s plans as “senseless” and warned of the long-lasting consequences the cuts would have on people who are already struggling to make ends meet. “The reality is that these measures will push even more people into poverty,” he asserted, highlighting the enduring impact on families who rely on state support to cover life’s essentials.
Comedian Rosie Jones, who has cerebral palsy, offered a personal perspective on the issue. “Disabled people are scared of what the future holds if there are cuts to disability payments,” she said. “These cuts will only deepen the hardship we already face, as the payments currently don’t even cover life’s essentials.” Her remarks have resonated with many who fear that the changes could worsen an already dire situation for disabled citizens across Britain.
Actor Stanley Tucci, known for his work with food bank charity Trussell, also joined the chorus of dissent. Speaking from London, Tucci criticised the Government’s approach as “wrong” and predicted that the reforms would force parents in disabled families to make heartbreaking choices, such as skipping meals so they can feed their children. “This is not the society we want to live in,” he said, stressing the need for a more humane and equitable system.
More Read
Former Strictly Come Dancing judge Dame Arlene Phillips added her voice to the growing opposition, arguing that the social security system should be “rooted in justice and compassion”. She described cutting disability benefits as “shameful”, contending that such measures fail to recognise the dignity and support that disabled people deserve.
Despite the backlash, the Government has defended its plans. In a statement, a Department for Work and Pensions spokesperson said: “Our reforms will build a social security system that’s fairer, more sustainable and fit for the future – so it can always be there for those with the greatest needs to live with the dignity and support they deserve.” The spokesperson also highlighted efforts to boost employment among disabled people, including a new premium and the end of reassessments for those who will never be able to work. Additionally, the Government has announced an above-inflation rise in the standard allowance for Universal Credit by 2029, although it also plans to cut the rate paid for the Universal Credit health element for new claimants from next year.
With charities like Trussell warning that around three-quarters of food bank users live in households with someone disabled, the debate over welfare cuts is intensifying. As the nation grapples with the implications of these reforms, a growing number of voices—both from within and beyond the political sphere—are demanding a reconsideration of policies that many believe will further marginalise the most vulnerable in society.
