For decades, the economy has been viewed as a cornerstone of electoral success, with conventional wisdom suggesting that voters make their choices largely based on economic performance. However, a recent study by Robert Gordon, an economist at Northwestern University, indicates that this longstanding belief may no longer hold true. As political polarization has intensified in the United States, the economy’s predictive power in elections has diminished, shifting the focus towards party allegiance and other social factors.
Changing dynamics
In his recent working paper, Gordon, who has tracked presidential elections since 1956, points out that while the economy remains a significant factor, its influence has waned considerably. “The economy is a big factor in elections, but it’s not as influential as it once was,” Gordon told Peter Coy in The New York Times. The study highlights how the economy indirectly affects election outcomes primarily through its impact on the president’s approval ratings rather than directly influencing voter decisions.
Gordon identifies the year 2000 as a pivotal turning point in this dynamic. With rising political polarization, voters began aligning their choices more closely with party affiliations, often disregarding economic indicators. This trend has only accelerated in recent elections, making the economy a less reliable predictor of electoral outcomes.
Economic indicators
Historically, two economic factors significantly impacted presidential approval ratings: economic growth adjusted for population and the average inflation rate during the president’s first three and a half years, compared to the same period under their predecessor. Known as the “excess” inflation rate, this metric served as a vital barometer for predicting election outcomes. Gordon’s research indicates that while these factors effectively predicted 15 out of 17 elections since 1956, they failed in the cases of the 2000 and 2016 elections, when Al Gore and Hillary Clinton received fewer Electoral College votes than anticipated.
Moreover, Gordon’s model also struggled to account for Donald Trump’s electoral success in 2016 and his victory in 2020, highlighting the limitations of relying solely on economic indicators. Despite an economic framework that suggested a Republican advantage, the actual outcomes revealed a more complex electoral landscape.
Implications for 2024
Looking ahead to the 2024 presidential election, Gordon’s model appears to predict a favorable outcome for a generic Republican candidate, given the high “excess” inflation rates. However, he cautions that the model’s reliability has diminished significantly. For instance, it suggests that Vice President Kamala Harris could secure only 183 electoral votes or fewer, a prediction Gordon believes she is likely to outperform, even if she ultimately loses.
This uncertainty illustrates a broader trend where economic indicators are no longer the sole determinants of electoral outcomes. Factors such as social issues, candidate charisma, and grassroots movements are increasingly shaping voter preferences, complicating the electoral equation.
More Read
The role of polarization
The increasing polarization in American politics plays a crucial role in this evolving landscape. Voters today are more likely to base their decisions on party loyalty and social issues rather than solely on economic conditions. Issues like racial justice, climate change, and healthcare have taken center stage, often overshadowing economic debates. This shift indicates a fundamental change in how voters engage with political candidates and their platforms.
Dr. Emily Thompson, a political analyst at the University of Michigan, emphasizes the importance of understanding this shift. “Voters are increasingly driven by their personal beliefs and social concerns. The economy, while important, is no longer the decisive factor it once was,” she explains.
Conclusion
As the 2024 election approaches, the diminishing predictive power of the economy underscores the need for candidates to engage with voters on a broader range of issues. The interplay between economic conditions, social issues, and party loyalty is becoming more complex, necessitating a multifaceted approach to campaigning.
Candidates will need to adapt to this changing landscape, addressing local concerns and societal trends while still acknowledging the role of economic conditions. In this new electoral environment, the ability to connect with voters on multiple fronts will be crucial for success, signaling a significant shift in the political dynamics of the United States. As Gordon’s research suggests, the economy may still matter, but its influence is evolving, requiring both analysts and politicians to rethink their strategies as they navigate this new reality.
