An FIR (First Information Report) has been filed against Kumara Chandrashekaranatha Swamiji, the seer of Vishwa Vokkaliga Mahasamstana Math, following his controversial remarks on the voting rights of Muslims. The statement, which sparked widespread outrage, was made during a protest organised by the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh in Karnataka earlier this week.
Swamiji, in his speech on Tuesday, advocated for the introduction of a law that would restrict the voting rights of the Muslim community. He further suggested that the Waqf Board, a body responsible for the management of Muslim properties in India, should be abolished. His comments were made in the context of ongoing protests by farmers against notices issued by the Karnataka Waqf Board, which were perceived by some as encroaching on agricultural lands.
In his address to the gathering, Swamiji voiced concerns over the alleged misuse of Waqf Board powers, claiming that it could lead to the unjust appropriation of farmers’ land. He stated, “Everyone should fight against the injustice being caused to farmers… it is said that the Waqf Board can claim anyone’s land. It is a big injustice… someone taking away someone else’s land is not Dharma.” He went on to assert that laws should be enacted to ensure Muslims do not have voting rights, a statement that has drawn sharp criticism from several quarters.
The remarks were condemned for their inflammatory and divisive nature, with critics accusing the seer of inciting communal tensions. Swamiji’s comments were widely circulated on social media, leading to calls for action from various political and social groups.
In response to the backlash, Swamiji issued an apology the following day, clarifying that his statement was a “slip of the tongue”. He further stated, “Muslims are also citizens of this country, and they too have voting rights like others,” seeking to downplay the controversial remarks.
However, the apology did little to quell the anger of those who felt that his words could potentially stoke religious and communal discord. The FIR was filed based on a complaint from a social worker who was concerned about the implications of Swamiji’s speech. According to police officials, a case has been registered under Section 299 of the Indian Penal Code, which deals with deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or beliefs.
The police have confirmed that the investigation is ongoing, and action will be taken in accordance with the law. “We have registered a case against him (Swamiji) under section 299 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,” said a senior police officer from Upparpet Police Station, where the FIR was filed on Wednesday.
More Read
The incident has brought attention to the ongoing tensions in Karnataka surrounding the land disputes linked to the Waqf Board. Farmers have been protesting against the Board’s notices, which they argue could lead to the illegal acquisition of their land, and Swamiji’s comments have only added fuel to the fire. While his supporters claim that he was merely expressing his concerns about the issue of land rights, his critics have accused him of making dangerous and communal remarks that could incite violence.
Political figures from various parties have also weighed in on the controversy. Leaders from the ruling BJP and opposition Congress have both condemned Swamiji’s statement, calling it an attempt to divide communities for political gain. Many have called for greater responsibility from religious leaders in ensuring their statements do not promote hate or intolerance.
The case against Swamiji is the latest in a series of incidents in which public figures have been scrutinised for their comments on sensitive religious issues. Legal experts suggest that the case will likely be closely watched, with many wondering if it will set a precedent for handling similar incidents in the future.
As the investigation continues, the debate over freedom of speech versus the responsibility of public figures to maintain social harmony is expected to intensify. For now, Swamiji remains in the spotlight, as his apology and the FIR filed against him leave questions about the broader implications of his controversial remarks on India’s social fabric.
