In a chilling revelation, two men who were shot during the first assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump this summer have come forward to express their outrage over what they describe as negligence on the part of the U.S. Secret Service. David Dutch, 57, a former Marine, and James Copenhaver, 74, a retired liquor store manager, shared their harrowing experience during an exclusive interview with NBC News, shedding light on the chaos that unfolded during the campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13.
The day of the attack
Dutch and Copenhaver were excitedly seated in the bleachers behind Trump when the atmosphere turned from enthusiastic support to sheer panic. Gunshots rang out, sending attendees scrambling for safety. Tragically, Corey Comperatore, 50, was killed while attempting to shield his family from the gunfire. Trump was also injured, suffering a wound to his ear during the incident.
“It was like getting hit with a sledgehammer right in the chest,” Dutch recalled, detailing the moment the bullets flew. He described a scene of chaos as chunks of the bleachers and metal were dislodged, creating a terrifying atmosphere until the shooting finally ceased.
Concerns over security
In the aftermath of the shooting, Dutch and Copenhaver have been vocal about their concerns regarding the security measures in place during the rally. They believe the Secret Service’s failure to adequately protect Trump and the crowd contributed to the tragic events. “It should have never happened,” Dutch stated emphatically, conveying his anger and frustration over the situation.
Copenhaver echoed Dutch’s sentiments, asserting that the shooting could have been prevented if security protocols had been properly followed. “It wouldn’t have happened had it been secure,” he said, highlighting the critical lapses that allowed the shooter, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, to open fire from an unsecured rooftop nearby before being fatally shot by sharpshooters.
Legal action considerations
Both men have retained legal counsel and are exploring the possibility of litigation against the Secret Service for what they consider negligence. Their attorneys are investigating the circumstances surrounding the attack and assessing the agency’s actions leading up to the event. “We believe there are grounds for legal action,” the attorneys stated, emphasizing the need for accountability in the wake of such a significant security breach.
Secret service’s response
Kimberly Cheatle, the director of the Secret Service at the time of the attack, has publicly acknowledged the incident as the agency’s most significant operational failure in decades. Following mounting pressure from lawmakers and public outcry, Cheatle stepped down this summer. The incident has prompted serious discussions about the adequacy of protective measures for public figures, especially in light of rising political tensions and threats.
More Read
Trump’s return to Pennsylvania
Earlier this month, Trump returned to the Pennsylvania fairgrounds where the assassination attempt occurred, rallying supporters and urging them to deliver an Election Day victory tied to his survival of the shooting. The former president’s return was a poignant reminder of the attack and the unresolved issues surrounding security at his events.
As the nation grapples with the implications of this violent attempt on a former president’s life, Dutch and Copenhaver’s testimony raises critical questions about the responsibilities of the Secret Service and the ongoing need for heightened security measures at political rallies. Their experience serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities present in the current political landscape, prompting a reevaluation of protocols designed to ensure the safety of public figures and their supporters.
In light of their injuries and the loss of life that day, Dutch and Copenhaver continue to seek justice, determined to hold accountable those they believe failed in their duty to protect. The incident underscores the need for comprehensive reforms to enhance security for political events, ensuring that such tragedies do not occur again in the future.
