Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband has remained tight-lipped on whether he personally supports the expansion of Heathrow Airport, despite the Labour government backing the project.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed last month that the Labour administration would support the construction of a third runway at Heathrow as part of the government’s broader economic growth strategy. However, Miliband, who in 2010 overturned Labour’s previous support for expansion due to environmental concerns, has refused to state whether his stance has changed.
When pressed on the matter, Miliband reiterated that he adheres to “collective responsibility” as a cabinet minister. “I am part of the government and I abide by collective responsibility,” he stated, affirming his participation in the decision-making process. However, he avoided providing a direct answer on whether his personal views align with the government’s policy.
The principle of collective responsibility dictates that all cabinet ministers must publicly support government decisions, regardless of their private opinions. Miliband’s absence from the chancellor’s announcement on Heathrow has sparked speculation about his personal reservations regarding the project.
Environmental concerns and future assessments
Speaking on the Today programme, Miliband emphasised that a final decision on Heathrow’s expansion remains “some years off.” He stressed that any proposals must adhere to strict carbon budgets and local environmental regulations before being approved.
“I do support what the government is doing, which is that we’ve asked Heathrow to come forward with their plans,” Miliband told Sky News. “But it’s really important to say these have got to meet strict carbon budgets and local environmental standards, and then an assessment will be made about whether a third runway can do that.”
His comments highlight the ongoing debate within government over balancing economic development with environmental commitments. While Labour aims to boost growth through infrastructure projects such as Heathrow’s expansion, concerns remain over their impact on climate targets.
Cabinet discussions and labour’s growth agenda
Miliband attended a cabinet away-day last Friday, where ministers deliberated on economic growth strategies and public service reforms. According to a Downing Street statement, Chancellor Reeves presented Heathrow’s expansion as “exactly the sort of model to boost growth for Britain,” urging ministers to accelerate their approach to economic development.
Sources close to Miliband suggest that resigning over the Heathrow issue would be futile, given that a final decision is still distant. Instead, he is focusing on key priorities within his portfolio, particularly his commitment to clean energy and net-zero targets.
Rosebank oil field and energy policy
Miliband also refrained from revealing his personal stance on the Rosebank oil field, another controversial project he previously opposed. Before taking office, he had criticised the development as “a colossal waste of taxpayer money” and “economic vandalism.”
As a minister, however, Miliband argued that he now has “different responsibilities” and must ensure decisions are taken through a “proper process” in a “fair and objective” manner. His comments reflect the complexities of governing, where ideological commitments often clash with economic and political realities.
Net zero and energy bills
Despite facing scrutiny over his shifting stance, Miliband reaffirmed his commitment to clean energy, describing it as “the biggest economic opportunity of the 21st century” for both job creation and environmental sustainability.
Addressing concerns about rising energy costs, he warned that “bills will keep rising” unless Britain transitions to “clean, home-grown power we control.” Labour’s focus on renewable energy and energy efficiency initiatives remains central to its broader economic and climate strategy.
More Read
New energy performance standards for rental properties
Miliband was also questioned about a government consultation on ensuring all rental properties achieve an energy performance certificate (EPC) rating of C or higher. While he acknowledged that the additional insulation costs could be passed onto tenants through higher rents, he defended the policy as “the fair thing to do.”
“Tenants’ associations are worried about damp, mouldy homes and high energy bills,” Miliband stated, underscoring Labour’s commitment to improving living conditions and reducing energy costs for renters.
Conclusion
Miliband’s reluctance to state his personal views on Heathrow and Rosebank highlights the challenges of balancing individual convictions with governmental responsibilities. As Labour pushes forward with its economic growth agenda, the coming years will determine whether its policies can successfully align economic expansion with environmental sustainability.
