Are we truly shocked that Keir Starmer has turned his back on trans rights the moment it became politically expedient? I spent months trying to convince fellow leftists that a vote for Labour under its current leadership was never a vote for LGBTQ+ people like me. It was always a gamble—and now we’re watching the chips fall.
This week, Starmer gave his approval to the UK Supreme Court’s ruling on the definition of “woman”, parroting that tired old line: “A woman is an adult female.” Funny, because back in 2022, he was assuring everyone that “trans women are women.” That was when it still scored political points. The moment the tide shifted, so did he. Predictable.
Let’s not pretend this is about principle. Labour politicians once draped themselves in rainbow flags, shared slick allyship videos, and spoke with conviction about queer rights. But those optics were always conditional. Now that it’s fashionable to court the bigots again, Starmer is conveniently hopping on the discrimination bandwagon.
And worse—he’s doing so by misrepresenting legal judgments he surely understands. As a former human rights lawyer, he knows full well what the Supreme Court actually said: that sex-based protections exist under the Equality Act, and that trans women have different but valid protections. Yet his party’s equalities spokesperson is now out here suggesting trans women use the men’s loo. That’s not ignorance—it’s a calculated dog whistle.
And no, it doesn’t matter what Keir Starmer “really believes” in his heart of hearts. Because a leader who abandons his values the second they’re inconvenient has no values at all. He’s not leading—he’s polling.
Let’s be clear: the idea that trans women are some sort of existential threat is absurd. Just 0.55% of the UK population is trans. Are we seriously meant to believe they’re simultaneously about to take over every women’s boardroom seat and all the toilet stalls in the country?
This hysteria isn’t new. It’s the same recycled culture war rubbish. Once, the scapegoat was gay people in schools. Now it’s trans people in bathrooms. It’s not grounded in reality—it’s designed to divide and distract.
Yes, there have been rare and tragic incidents involving trans individuals committing crimes. But they are dwarfed—completely—by the volume of violence committed by cis men. Yet we don’t call for the exclusion of all men from public spaces. Why? Because that would be ludicrous. So why the exception when it comes to trans women?
The hypocrisy is palpable. Take Nicola Murray, a campaigner against trans-inclusive refuges backed by the so-called “gender critical” movement. She’s just been convicted of sexually assaulting four children. Does that mean every advocate for single-sex spaces should now be viewed with suspicion? Of course not. But that’s the toxic logic we’re being asked to accept—when it suits an anti-trans agenda.
More Read
It’s exhausting trying to explain your right to exist to people who are determined not to hear you. Hate isn’t based on logic—it’s based on fear. And fear, as always, is being weaponised by those in power.
This country is in crisis. We’re the sixth largest economy in the world, and yet most of us live one emergency away from disaster. The NHS is crumbling, rents are unaffordable, and the cost of living is spiralling. But instead of addressing these urgent issues, Labour—like the Tories before them—is scapegoating minorities. Migrants, disabled people, and now trans folk.
It’s the same old fascist trick. Divide. Distract. Dominate.
Human rights are not a limited resource. Protecting one group doesn’t take anything away from another. But Labour’s playing a con game—trading away dignity and safety for votes. And if you think it’ll stop with trans people, think again.
You can wait until they come for you. Or you can stand up now, shoulder to shoulder with those already in the crosshairs.
There’s still time to choose solidarity over compliance. I won’t say “I told you so” again. Just don’t say no one warned you.
